Revelation 1.1-8
The Revelation was a prophecy, an
apocalypse, and a letter. We have no idea what these things mean.
Rather, I should say, what we typically think they mean is not what they
meant to John and his readers. Prophecy, for example, does not mean
“prediction”, not in the biblical vocabulary anyway. Oh, for sure,
predicting the future is one aspect of prophecy, but it’s not the whole.
Even “false” prophets accurately predicted the future. But in the
Bible, a true prophet was one whose words lead people to faithfully
follow God, and those ‘words’ were usually more about correcting the
present than dictating what happened next . Prophecy was less about
foretelling than it was about criticism, a sharp critique of the present
rather than a horoscope for tomorrow’s events.
An apocalypse, likewise, was not a doomsday
prediction about the end of the world. It was a literary genre with a
relatively short life-span (c. 100BC-c. 200 AD). It was a kind of
writing that utilized symbols to communicate truth. The
closest approximations we have today are political cartoons and
science-fiction novels. And, granted, sometimes apocalyptic literature
did talk about the end of the world, but not always and certain not
exclusively.
But what about a letter? Surely we know what that is, right?
Nope. Not really. These ‘letters’ weren’t
like our emails or the little white envelopes our mother’s send us on
holidays. These kind of letters were circular, meaning John wrote one
letter that got passed around to several different churches in order to
be read out loud. It’s the ‘reading out loud part’ that’s important
here. Think of this “letter” as something like a decree, or a
proclamation. At the end of this 6-week series on Revelation, we’re
going to get together at the Winds and read Revelation out loud, have
communion, and sing. June 24. Mark it on your calendar, ’cause I think
that evening—probably more than anything else I say or teach—will help
you understand the book. Which is the point, right? Understanding.
Because, as we’ve just discovered, our understanding is somewhat
lacking. We used to think we were reading a play-by- play breakdown
concerning the end of the world written to a couple of pastors; but now,
we realize we’re reading something different. This is a critique of
the circumstances of the ancient world, using colorful language and
metaphor to help shock hearers into embracing passionate truth. And it
wasn’t just a message for a few yokels. It was meant to be broadcast to
the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment